“Why is that a man wearing only his ganji and shorts can sit around with the entire family whereas you’ve never seen a woman of the house sitting around in her undergarments. That’s how we function,right?”
Women of the house did sit around and work wearing nothing on top until as close as 150 years ago. And still do in some parts of the world.
Women redo their saris after long bus journeys, right on the bus stops and nobody cares (and nobody should). Cleavages, shoulders and bare backs show all over North India, nobody even gives a second glance. In Haryana, women cover their faces, while the torso is exposed, nobody has any problems.
Then how is it that a woman in T shirt and jeans risks being seen as dressed provocatively?
It’s simply a matter of a society getting used to women dressing in certain ways. And that too can, and does change from time to time.
Take a look at these two examples,
1. Women in Kerala 150 years ago.
Some 150 years back the women in Kerala launched a feminist revolt for the right to cover their breast, women in Kerala were not allowed to cover their breast; mostly this rule was applicable to lower caste women, when someone from higher caste would come she should show her breast to cover ones breast was considered a sign of immodesty. Brahmin women can cover their breast while venturing out but at home they had to be topless, Shatriya women cant cover breast infront of Brahmins and lower cast women couldn’t cover breast infront of anyone. The cloth worn on lower part couldn’t be lower than the knee.
I think in most of ancient India women generally were topless, there are some mention about this is Kamasutra. If you think about the climate in India, generally hot and humid most of the time, I would say being topless is the right way.
Coming back to Kerala, what lead to the change in the topless trend was apparently the contact with the Brits. Some people converted to Christianity and as per European standards started wearing upper body garments, the higher caste people beat the shit out of such women, slowly the contact with Britishers and rest of India made topless out of fashion, women started feeling ashamed of being topless, it made them feel inferior.
Coming back to Kerala, what lead to the change in the topless trend was apparently the contact with the Brits.” [Link]
2. Women in Nagaland today.
Mr Balvinder Singh’s experience in Nagaland shows making rules about covering up a woman’s body, is the beginning of objectification of women, to ensure ‘excitement’ does not ‘turn into monotony’.
“The men wore only a loincloth and the females wrapped just a shawl below their waists. The women folk of all ages were seen working in the fields, carrying fire wood or hay for the animals, pounding barley, washing clothes at village water points, knitting on hand looms (almost every house had a hand loom where the women would knit shawls etc) or attending to other such daily chores of life, wearing nothing on top.
While a small cleavage visible under the thin dupatta or through the pallu of a woman’s saree is certainly a pleasant sight for any man worth his salt, without harbouring any malafide thoughts in the mind, but there in the villages of Nagaland it was an anti climax to see the dangling pairs of bare boobs, available to look at in abundance in all shapes and sizes. Initially they were a cause of some excitement, which was natural , but gradually the excitement turned into monotony. I was reminded of the words of a famous poet that the ‘beauty that is veiled looks more beautiful’.” [Link]
Did the women in the above examples face more sexual harassment than women today because more of their skin was exposed? They didn’t of course. But why didn’t they?
What do you think, was the society more civilised then or were the men just used to women being dressed that way?