Maqbool Fida Hussain might give up Indian citizenship.
The Sangh Parivar insists that Hussain has to apologize if he wants to return home. Why? Because “every freedom in democracy has a limit..”
They don’t mean everybody’s freedom though.
A chosen few in India seem to have unlimited freedom to reinterpret religion (including yours and mine), unlimited freedom to stop normal life with threats of violence, unlimited freedom to get away with violence, and until recently , unlimited freedom to demand apologies.
A chosen few must define these limits for the rest of the us.
Muthalik (now pink black faced), Meeta Jamal in Kanpur University, some students in Aligarh Muslim University , the RSS, and the Sanskrati Bachao Sangh in MP, and now (updated to add) rioters in Karnataka seem to believe they are amongst the chosen few.
Here are the kind of limits our street-censor-boards would approve of. This is more dangerous than even a ban on jeans or lingerie display because it subtly undoes a lot of hard work that time, technology and reformers have done.
Does this article disapprove of single parents, working mothers, birth control, premarital sex for girls (only girls), individual rights for girls, and equal rights for girls?
[Click to read the article.]
“Today girls are upfront in demanding their rights.Nothing can come in their way.Comments Dr Shayama Chona,an educationist for 44 years,They expect society to respect their equality with boys.They are bright,bold,beautiful,and want to drink,smoke,go for late night parties,but dont know how to handle it when trouble arises.”
Muthalik will love this comment. And I wish I could believe the first two lines.
Does the ‘trouble arise’ because they expect society to respect their ‘equality with boys’?
Those who demand equality also drink, smoke and stay out all night?
Those who get into ‘trouble’ are those who drink, smoke and demand equality?
How is drinking and smoking related to freedom, equality, or being bold, bright and beautiful? In fact smoking is bad for skin, and alcohol has calories that go against the average idea of beauty today. Also does this mean boys and girls who do not smoke or drink do not think they are equal citizens?
Too much emphasis on individual rights can come in the way of nurturing good relationships.
How? Can somebody explain please?
Mostly those who suppress individual rights for the (what they consider) ‘welfare of society’ are talking about their personal ideas of what is good for the society (e.g. no gay rights, no lingerie display, no inter-religious marriages). There is a risk of their ideas being wrong or biased- so personal choices are best left to each equally intelligent individual.
Individual rights ensure that a few individuals do not force an entire society to confirm to their ideas of right or wrong.
Says senior psychiatrist Dr Rajiv Anand, I,me,myself and to hell with others! This attitude is leading to emotional instability among girls.
If women do not suppress their dreams and desires it does not mean they have an ‘I,me,myself and to hell with others!’ attitude.
Its not ‘emotionally unstable’ to want to grow, dream, have ambitions and hopes for oneself.
This one seems to be an idea straight out of a Bollywood movie.
Add to this,the easy access to illegal substances,birth control methods,etc,which make these female brats believe they know it all.”
Illegal substances and birth control methods cannot be put in the same bracket. Birth Control is not an illegal substance. Birth Control ensures young girls do not have to go through what this teenager in Faridabad went through. (Click to read).
Access to ‘illegal substances’ is equally harmful for all genders and a lot more awareness and respect for one’s body and health is needed to discourage substance abuse.
Some people (women and men) are more prone to addiction than others – they need counselling, support and rehabilitation.
This kind of biased moralising is harmful because it might make a young girl suspect substance abuse can be compared to sex and that might make illegal substances look fine to them.
Those who object to premarital sex are rarely (never) thinking of the girls. Their only concern is their rigid idea of morality for women.